Incumbent John Cornyn came out of the Republican primary with a slim lead over challenger Ken Paxton going into the runoff. But recent polling has Paxton leading by eight points.
A new poll from the nonpartisan Texas Public Opinion Research (TPOR) shows state Attorney General Ken Paxton leading Sen. John Cornyn by 8 percentage points among likely voters in the Republican Senate primary runoff on May 26.
Don’t believe the “nonpartisan” tag. TPOR is run by Luke Warford (indeed, his is the only profile under “Our Team” on their website), the losing Democratic Railroad Commission candidate in 2022. That said, looking at the crosstabs, it looks like an actual Republican sample for a Republican runoff.
The poll, released Friday and conducted by the polling firm Slingshot Strategies on behalf of TPOR, shows Paxton leading Cornyn by a margin of 48% to 40%, with 11% undecided.
Perhaps most significantly, the poll indicates that, even if President Donald Trump were to endorse Cornyn, it would not give him enough of a boost to close the gap with Paxton.
Trump, who had previously said he was planning to endorse a candidate in the contest, has so far stayed out of the race. But in the event of a Trump endorsement, the poll says, Paxton would still lead Cornyn by 45% to 42%. By contrast, a Trump endorsement of Paxton would widen the attorney general’s lead over the incumbent U.S. senator to 55% to 35%.
“That is in large part because the MAGA coalition in Texas in this electorate is behind Paxton,” said Evan Roth Smith, a founding partner at Slingshot Strategies.
“Many undecided voters in this election are hoping to elect a MAGA candidate. That’s one of the qualities that undecided voters tell us they’re looking for. The president’s endorsement, it would make a little difference, but it wouldn’t make a world of difference, for John Cornyn. It would put this race to bed for Ken Paxton, in all likelihood.”
Paxton appears to be picking up support from voters who backed U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Houston in the first round of voting. Some 45% of voters who previously cast ballots for Hunt say they now support Paxton, compared to 32% for Cornyn, with 24% of former Hunt voters still undecided.
RELATED: John Cornyn wallops Ken Paxton in first quarter fundraising for U.S. Senate seat
The poll shows Paxton leading Cornyn among men (50% to 40%), non-college-educated voters (53% to 36%), Latino voters (52% to 34%), and voters under 65. Cornyn holds a narrow lead among voters 65 and older (45% to 43%) and college-educated voters (46% to 42%).
Though the source is suspect, 1225 likely Republican voters is actually a pretty good sample size for a runoff. The results are bad news for an incumbent who’s had millions in PAC money poured into his campaign. It suggests that Cornyn fatigue has set in across Texas Republicans at large, not merely every single Republican I talk to on a regular basis.
Right now, it appears that the race is Paxton’s to lose.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against the Democratic political fundraising platform ActBlue over its donation processes that allegedly “allow fraudulent and foreign donations.”
According to the New York Times, ActBlue has processed nearly $19 billion in contributions since its 2004 inception. The organization reported $1.8 billion in 2025 alone, a 41 percent increase compared to 2021. Last year, ActBlue saw 1.35 million new donors add to its over 52 million contributions received.
“The radical left has relied on ActBlue as a way to funnel foreign donations and dark money into their political campaigns to subvert our laws and compromise the integrity of our elections,” the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) said in an April 20 press release.
Paxton alleged the organization has lied to Congress and “blatantly ignored state law that prohibits deceptive practices.”
“In 2023, Attorney General Paxton opened an investigation into whether ActBlue was enabling donor fraud in violation of Texas law,” the press release stated.
“ActBlue has cooperated with our ongoing investigation,” Paxton said in August 2024. “They have changed their requirements to now include ‘CVV’ codes for donations on their platform.”
“This is a critical change that can help prevent fraudulent donations,” he continued, adding that “suspicious activity on fundraising platforms must be fully investigated to determine if any laws have been broken.”
In October 2024, Paxton sent a petition for rulemaking to the FEC “detailing how suspicious actors had appeared to be continuing to use ActBlue’s political fundraising platform to make a large number of straw political donations,” the press release said. He also made a criminal referral to the U.S. Department of Justice the same month.
“Amidst the OAG’s investigation and a Congressional investigation, ActBlue claimed it stopped its illegal operations,” the OAG said.
Paxton cited recent reporting from the New York Times in which “ActBlue’s own outside counsel acknowledged that the organization’s representations about its donation safeguards were not true.”
Paxton further alleged that certain safeguards are not consistently implemented, “creating a substantial risk that impermissible foreign contributions may have been processed.”
The OAG said it was able to show that ActBlue processes gift card and prepaid debit card donations, “despite the company’s representations that the opposite is true.” Paxton said these payments could enable fraudulent donations and violations of state and federal election laws due to limited identification requirements.
Reports have ActBlue carrying out the very shady, unethical actions Paxton is accusing them of, allowing foreign nationals to donate to American campaigns and enabling straw donations in the names of people who never donated to Democrats. Such accusations have been flying around almost as long ActBlue has existed, and the persistence of the same “mistakes” over and over again suggest such criminal activity is intentional.
Here’s news I missed last week: Two employees with the Macon County Board of Elections were among those indicted for fraud. The catch is that it’s the just the regular money kind of fraud.
Five people in Georgia—including two election officials with a county government—have been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of orchestrating a multi-million dollar healthcare scheme.
Sure seems to be a lot of healthcare fraud popping up recently. Almost like someone made it easier to cheat…
An unsealed indictment names Dawn James-Ellis, Angela Childs, Adrian Harris, Lamonica Lakes and Tarshea Fudge-Riley as defendants, all facing charges of conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud.
Fudge-Riley and Lakes are employees with the Macon County Board of Elections.
All five pleaded not guilty when they appeared before a federal judge this week. The case against them involves the alleged submission of fraudulent medical claims to insurers for mental health services that were never delivered.
Prosecutors have accused James-Ellis, a licensed therapist, of billing Cigna, Aetna and other companies for mental health counseling sessions that never happened. As part of the conspiracy, the other defendants were allegedly willing accomplices, who served as would-be patients to have their insurance billed.
James-Ellis, who also faces a charge of identity theft, would allegedly send kickbacks to the others after she received payment from health plans.
To cover her tracks, it’s alleged she had the “patients” create session notes to solidify the idea that services were delivered through James-Ellis’s practice, called Therapy on the Go.
Authorities maintain that the fraud scheme involved millions of dollars exchanging hands, but no specific figure was revealed. For now, the case is in its early stages, and facts allowed at trial will be decided during future hearings.
It’s believed incidents of fraud spanned nearly four years. The indictment claims the conspiracy began in January 2019 and ended sometime in December 2022.
So we have two Georgia already accused of participating in a fraud ring that started before the disputed 2020 Presidential election. Macon is a small county that went for Biden in 2020. Perhaps too small to make a notable difference, but here are two election officials already (allegedly) engaged in one type of fraud. Why not another?
In any case, pious declarations that Georgia election officials are beyond moral reproach appear to be misguided…
President Donald Trump cracked a joke about wanting to take a psychedelic during a White House event touting the benefits of the drugs.
The president made the remark at a Saturday morning event in the Oval Office, where he signed an executive order to “accelerate medical treatments for serious mental illness,” including the therapeutic benefits of LSD, psilocybin, ecstasy, and other psychedelics.
In attendance was the popular podcaster, Joe Rogan, who has advocated for the treatments but has also recently been fiercely critical of Trump’s war in Iran.
Trump touted the success of the psychedelic drug ibogaine—a Schedule I controlled substance—and cited a study in which he said participants experienced an “80 to 90 percent reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety within one month.”
I’d like to see the actual study. A whole lot of studies show one thing, and then a better, larger study comes down the line in a year or two that contradicts the first. Many studies said “Marijuana is great for treating X!” and now we’re getting other studies that show “Probably not.”
“Can I have some, please?” Trump quipped, prompting the room to erupt in laughter. “I’ll do whatever it takes…I don’t have time to be depressed. If you stay busy enough, maybe that’s what works too, that’s what I do.”
Rogan, who endorsed Trump for president in 2024, said the executive order came about after he sent Trump a text message about psychedelic therapies.
Veteran organizations and psychedelic advocates have long contended that the ibogaine, which is made from a shrub native to West Africa, has great promise for hard-to-treat conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder and opioid addiction.
All I know about ibogaine comes from Hunter S. Thompson talking about Edmund Muskie possibly using it in Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ’72. I do not think this qualifies me as any kind of expert.
Retired Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell, who has written about his struggles with depression and PTSD in the memoir Lone Survivor, told Trump how ibogaine changed his life “for the better.”
“You’re going to save a lot of lives with it,” Luttrell told Trump. “I’d like to say how grateful I am to have had the opportunity to go through the program and receive the Ibogaine.”
“I want to tell everybody how this happened,” Rogan explained. “I sent President Trump some information… the text message that came back: ‘Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it,’” Rogan claimed. “It was literally that quick.”
Am I worried that Joe Rogan can get policy changed by texting the President? A whole lot less than if it were George Soros or Neville Roy Singham doing it for a Democratic president. Rogan has at least rejected woke madness and is willing to listen to evidence.
In a grander scheme of things, I’m not worried about limited legal use for psychedelic drugs because the Constitution doesn’t designate regulating drug use as an enumerated power of the federal government in the first place. As such, federal drug prohibition is unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment. Unless it involves interstate commerce, federalism and subsidiarity leave drug regulation up to the states.
Here’s an Asmongold video on the press conference:
At the very least, hopefully we should get some good data on whether psychedelics like ibogaine are actually effective in treating PTSD and other disorders. Maybe they’ll help, and maybe they won’t.
You can’t get good data on what you’re not allowed to study.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is notorious for its pathological hatred of Israel. However, this hatred didn’t prevent the two countries from cooperating against a mutual enemy: Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
“In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Israel actively collaborated with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in fact described that country as its most valuable ally, even above the United States, which will undoubtedly shock some people watching this video. But of course, they both feared Iraq, an enemy to both of their nations, and particularly were worried about Saddam Hussein acquiring nuclear weapons.”
“The problem dated back to the 1960s, when Iraq began to establish a nuclear energy program for civilian use [“Civilian use.” Sure it was. -LP] and by the mid 1970s was looking to purchase a reactor.”
“Most countries wouldn’t touch such a deal with a barge pole. Except the French, who made a deal with Iraq in 1974 to75 to sell them an Osiris class research reactor plus 72 kg of 93% enriched uranium and of course provide the training for Iraqi personnel to run such a facility.”
“The deal would net the French $300 million at today’s prices about $1.7 billion.”
“Israel’s Mossad Intelligence Organization began immediate efforts to sabotage the program before all of the equipment and scientists were in place in Iraq. On the 6th of April 1979, Mossad agents damaged the Ozerak reactor while it was awaiting shipment from France.”
“Then the Mossad went further and assassinated Egyptian nuclear scientist Professor Yahya El Mashad, who would head the Iraqi nuclear program, killing him in his room at the Meridian Hotel in Paris.”
“However, Iraq did receive in July 1980 12kg of highly enriched uranium fuel for the reactor, the first of six phase deliveries from France.”
“Israel first tried diplomatic pressure via France and the United States, but the French government was unmoved.”
“The longer Israel waited, so the Israelis thought, the larger the chance that Saddam Hussein would begin building a nuclear bomb.”
“The Mossad also poisoned two Iraqi engineers involved with the project in Switzerland and France, respectively, and sent threatening letters to French personnel involved in the deal, frightening some of them off.”
“In 1979, the US allied Shah of Iran was deposed in the Islamic Revolution and a new government formed under Ayatollah Khomeini. He was no friend of Israel or the Jews, but Israel nonetheless urged Iran to bomb the Iraqi reactor.”
“Iran actually didn’t require much persuasion. The new hardline Islamic regime in Tehran hated Iraq and saw it as a greater threat than Israel.”
“The Iran-Iraq War broke out shortly afterwards when Saddam’s army invaded Iran. And it appeared that getting rid of any possible nuclear weapons that he might develop was in the interests of both Iran and Israel.”
Problem: The U.S. embargoed spare parts to Iran due to that pesky hostage crisis. “Incredibly, the Israelis secretly shipped US-made aircraft spares to Tehran so that the Iranian air force could put together a viable strike force.”
“The Ozerak reactor site was defended by a single battery of Soviet SA6 missiles, plus three batteries of French Roland 2 missiles and some Soviet 23 and 57 mm radar guided anti-aircraft guns.”
“Due to the state of the Iranian Air Force, its F-4 Phantom fighter bombers could only jam the SA6s and not the Rolands. So the pilots would have to fly very low and fast and depart equally quickly, requiring great skill. Israel and Syria also provided the Iranians with some up-to-date intelligence on the reactor site.”
“Operation Scorch Sword, the Iranian attack, commenced on the 30th of September, 1980 with four F4 Phantoms flying to the Iraqi border and being refueled by an Iranian Boeing 707 tanker escorted by two F-14 Tomcats. Each Phantom carried six Mark 82 general purpose bombs, two AI7 Sparrow air-to-air missiles, also had an integral M61A1 Vulcan 20mm cannon.”
“The Phantoms then raced into Iraq at very low level, then climbed to allow the Iraqi radars to briefly paint them in an effort to confuse the Iraqis as to the direction the Iranian aircraft were traveling and then drop low again and turn towards the reactor site. One pair would bomb the reactor. The other pair would attack its associated power station.”
“The pair approached the Tamuz reactor at low level, pulled up about 2 and 1/2 km from their target, and then released 12 bombs.”
“At the same time, the other two Phantoms, bombed the power station at Tammuz, knocking out electricity to Baghdad for 2 days. Two bombs hit the Tammuz One reactor, while others started a huge fire, destroyed all sorts of equipment, laboratories, and other support buildings. No shots were fired at the Iranian planes.”
“Damage to the reactor was listed by the Iraqis as ‘minor.'”
So time for the Israelis to take a whack. “The Israeli operation was code-named Opera, and had to wait until Israel received their brand-spanking-new F-16s from the U.S.
“Reconnaissance missions found a blind spot in Iraq’s radars on the border with Saudi Arabia, and it was decided that the Israelis would enter via this gap.”
“The Israeli attack force comprised eight F-16As, each armed with two unguided Mark 84 2,000lb delay action bombs. Cover was to be provided by a further flight of six F-15As.”
Random fact: “The attacking pilots included Ilan Ramon, who would later die aboard the space shuttle Colombia in 2003, where he was a payload specialist.”
“On the 7th of June 1981, the Israeli attack force departed, passing through Jordanian and Saudi airspace and when challenged, telling air traffic control over Jordan that they were Saudi patrol that had gone off course, and over Saudi Arabia that they were a Jordanian patrol that had likewise become lost.
“The F-16s climbed to 6,900 ft 12 mi from the reactor, then dived at 680 mph, releasing bombs at 3,600 ft. Eight out of 16 bombs hit the reactor containment dome. Iraqi anti-aircraft fire opened up, but the F-16s climbed away unharmed.”
“Though Saddam determined to rebuild the reactor with French assistance, the ongoing war with Iran and payment problems killed this off. And in 1991, during the first Gulf War, the US bombed the facility out of existence permanently.”
Trump’s Iran blockade twists Iran’s arm into opening the Strait of Hormuz, Ukraine blows up a bunch more Russian oil and gas infrastructure, leftists try to remove more rights from their political opponents, and this weekend in Austin you can get a dog for $5!
It’s the Friday LinkSwarm!
I got my taxes done and mailed off. (I owed nothing because I made so little money last year.)
Trump wins again. “Iran, U.S. Announce Strait of Hormuz ‘Completely Open’ for Commercial Ships.”
The Strait of Hormuz is “completely open” for all commercial ships, the U.S. and Iran said Friday, after the agreement of a cease-fire in Lebanon.
“IRAN HAS JUST ANNOUNCED THAT THE STRAIT OF IRAN IS FULLY OPEN AND READY FOR FULL PASSAGE. THANK YOU!” President Trump said in a post on Truth Social, appearing to refer to the Strait of Hormuz.
The president also said that Iran would begin working to remove all of the sea mines from the strait, with the help of the U.S.
He said in a second post that the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports “WILL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT” until peace negotiations with Iranian leaders are “100% COMPLETE.”
The blockade was first put into effect on Monday, with U.S. forces looking to stop Iranian and Iran-linked ships. The blockade came after negotiations in Pakistan to end the Iran war collapsed.
The president said at the time that the blockade would be enforced in an effort to stop Iran from policing the strait to its economic benefit while other countries suffer.
Iran had imposed a toll on vessels passing through the strait and has limited oil exports. It had allowed only a handful of countries, including China and India, to pass through the strait.
“Iran promised to open the Strait of Hormuz, and they knowingly failed to do so…as they promised, they better begin the process of getting this INTERNATIONAL WATERWAY OPEN AND FAST!” Trump said earlier this week.
Days before Saturday’s failed negotiations in Pakistan, Trump announced a two-week cease-fire, contingent upon Iran agreeing to the “complete, immediate, and safe opening” of the Strait of Hormuz.
Meanwhile, Trump on Thursday announced that Israel has agreed to a ten-day cease-fire in Lebanon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel had an “opportunity to forge a historic peace agreement with Lebanon” but said Israeli forces would remain inside Lebanese territory in a “reinforced security buffer zone.”
How is an open Strait but the U.S. keeps the blockade anything but a complete win for Trump?
All ships can sail through the Strait of Hormuz but this needs to be coordinated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a senior Iranian official told Reuters, adding that unfreezing Iranian funds was part of the deal.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi wrote on X that the strait was open after a ceasefire accord was agreed in Lebanon, while U.S. President Donald Trump said he believed a deal to end the Iran war would come “soon”, although the timing remains unclear.
Hundreds of ships and 20,000 seafarers have remained stranded inside the Gulf waiting to pass through the key waterway, which handles about 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas flows.
It’s still unclear who is actually calling the shots in Tehran these days.
It looks like Iran’s rulers have finally blinked — but that doesn’t mean they won’t try to weasel out of every promise they’re now making.
Tehran announced Friday that it’s opening the Strait of Hormuz, and supposedly even cooperating with US forces to sweep out all mines.
President Donald Trump says the regime has even agreed to end its quest for nuclear weapons and hand over its “nuclear dust” — nearly 1,000 pounds of highly-refined uranium now buried below various bunkers destroyed by American bombing last year.
But Trump knows Tehran has a long history of breaking its word — and it’s not even certain that the figures we’re negotiating with are the ultimate decision-makers.
Nor if Iran’s current leaders will be in charge next month: Regime factions will be a while realigning after US and Israel attacks slaughtered most of the top ranks — no one there or here knows how it’ll play out.
Snip.
Remember: Even the Islamic Republic’s so-called moderates are still Islamic fundamentalists who despise America and the West and believe that lying to non-Muslim leaders is entirely moral.
Meanwhile, a lasting peace deal that ensures Iran can’t go nuclear requires a reliable process for monitoring compliance, including “inspect anywhere, anytime” rules.
Also a must-monitor: Bans on acquisition of new missiles and missile tech, lest Tehran again threaten the entire region.
Plus financial controls to prevent the Revolutionary Guard’s Quds Force from again fostering and commanding terrorists far outside Iran.
If the regime doesn’t agree to these terms, and institutionalize enforcement, its oil exports must remain blocked as the bombing resumes.
For the past five weeks, opponents of the Trump administration have repeatedly called this “a war of choice,” a conflict the president launched without cause or coherent purpose. “[W]hen we ask, What is the administration doing? they can’t answer that question because they don’t know why they’re there in the first place,” Jake Sullivan told progressive talk-show host Jon Stewart. “They haven’t been able to give us an answer as to what this is all about.”
The administration has, in fact, made a clear and compelling case. It reduces to two interlocking imperatives. The first is Trump’s long-standing red line. As the president has stated repeatedly for years, “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple.” The second is the enabling condition that made this red line urgent: overmatch. Iran’s drones and ballistic missiles can overwhelm the air and missile defenses of Israel, the United States, and their Gulf allies.
In the June 2025 “12-Day War,” Iran absorbed heavy losses to its ballistic arsenal, which fell to roughly 1,500 missiles, and to key production sites. President Trump hoped that those losses would moderate Iranian behavior and bring Tehran to the negotiating table. That hope proved unfounded.
The IRGC moved immediately to rebuild. Work resumed at production plants, and stockpiles in hardened underground missile cities grew. IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Majid Mousavi stated in January 2026 that the arsenal had grown since the June war and that output across multiple sectors had already exceeded prewar levels. Israeli intelligence assessed that Iran was on track for a stockpile of roughly 8,000 ballistic missiles by 2027.
At the outset of the war, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described overmatch as the factor that drove America to act. “The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy, particularly to naval assets,” he said at a March 2 press conference. He then quantified the threat. “They are producing, by some estimates, over 100 of these missiles a month. Compare that to the six or seven interceptors that can be built a month.”
The arithmetic spoke for itself and posed two interlocking threats. The first was conventional. Iran would soon have enough missiles and drones to overwhelm the defenses of Israel and every American base in the region. The second was nuclear. The huge conventional arsenal would serve as a shield behind which Iran could pursue a nuclear weapon without fear of retaliation—directly violating the president’s red line. If Iran were left unchecked, Rubio explained, it would soon “have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and can inflict so much damage, that no one can do anything about their nuclear program.” Once Iran crossed that threshold, which Rubio called the “point of immunity,” the window for action would close permanently.
America therefore had three choices: to do nothing, in which case Iran would soon enter a zone of immunity guaranteed by overmatch; to let Israel attack alone, in which case Iran would attack American forces and cause significant casualties; or to work together with Israel to eliminate an intolerable threat to both countries.
Myth 2: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action had moderated Iran and stabilized the Middle East before Trump broke it.
While arguing about the war, former Obama and Biden staffers are attempting to justify Obama’s nuclear deal and the strategy that produced it. The JCPOA, Sullivan tells Stewart, worked. Iran was “complying with the deal. Even the Israeli intelligence were saying they were complying with the agreement.” Trump’s 2018 unilateral withdrawal, Sullivan suggests, discarded this successful state of affairs.
This story fails to comport with reality in three crucial ways. First, the timeline doesn’t work. Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal in May 2018. Tehran did not begin enriching its uranium to 60%, a major threshold that dramatically shortens the path to a nuclear weapon, until April 2021. In other words, Tehran made this crucial leap toward weaponization on Biden’s watch, not Trump’s.
And how did Biden respond? With conciliation. The administration stopped enforcing sanctions, especially against Chinese buyers. Iranian oil exports surged, and with them regime revenues. As Iran’s breakout time shrank to a matter of weeks, Biden and his team painted the increasing threat it had created as Trump’s fault. Every Iranian nuclear advance became, in their telling, not only a consequence of the 2018 withdrawal but also a justification for further conciliation. Then National Security Adviser Sullivan said so explicitly in April 2022, when Iran was racing forward under Biden’s presidency, that its progress “is a direct impact of [Trump’s] pulling out of the nuclear deal, making us less safe, giving us less visibility. And it’s one of the reasons we pursued a diplomatic path, again, when the president took office.”
Biden restored the core logic of the JCPOA unilaterally. Sanctions relief flowed while nuclear constraints collapsed. Tehran blew past the restrictions on the size of its uranium stockpiles and levels of enrichment while Washington relaxed pressure and pursued diplomacy on Iran’s terms. What Sullivan presents as the collapse of the deal was its continuation on asymmetric terms, slavish compliance in Washington without reciprocity in Tehran.
As sanctions enforcement weakened and oil revenue from China flowed, the regime did not moderate. Iran accelerated its missile and drone programs, deepened its support for proxies, and hardened the capabilities that now define the battlefield. Sanctions relief generated revenue. Revenue funded missiles, drones, and proxies. Those capabilities produced the overmatch that eroded deterrence.
The JCPOA and Biden’s de facto implementation of it financed and enabled the capabilities that drove the region toward large-scale conflict. Under Biden, Iran reached 60% enrichment and expanded its missile and drone programs. The Oct. 7 massacre in Israel was a direct result of Iran’s increasingly advantageous strategic posture.
The United States faced the same strategic choice at the end of the JCPOA process as it did at the beginning, but under worse conditions and against a stronger adversary. The policy, that is to say, ensured that the confrontation would come after Iran had advanced closer to immunity.
If ever we had a president who believes that “bigger is better,” it’s Donald Trump, and his administration just embiggened the blockade against Iran to include sanctioned ships from anywhere.
“In addition to enforcing the blockade, all Iranian vessels, vessels with active OFAC sanctions, and vessels suspected of carrying contraband, are subject to belligerent right to visit and search,” U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) announced on Thursday. But here’s where it gets really interesting: “These vessels, regardless of location, are subject to visit, board, search, and seizure.”
Emphasis added because that’s serious.
Regardless of location? If I’m reading that right, the “Persian Gulf blockade” just went global.
Joint Chiefs chair Gen. Dan Caine confirmed the expanded scope this morning during a presser with War Secretary Pete Hegseth. “Under the command of Adm. Paparo, we’ll actively pursue any Iranian-flagged vessel or any vessel attempting to provide material support to Iran,” Caine said. “This includes dark fleet vessels carrying Iranian oil. As most of you know, dark fleet vessels are those illicit or illegal ships evading international regulations, sanctions, or insurance requirements.”
Baltimore can’t decide who gets to ladle out the fraud. “Baltimore Reparations Fund Plagued by Infighting and Struggles for Control. ‘The City Hall says the mayor has final say, while commissioners maintain the body was created to independently manage the funds.'”
When the state of Maryland legalized marijuana for personal use a few years ago, it designated a percentage of sales to be put in a special fund, which would be used in part to pay reparations for slavery and to fund various social programs.
The fund now contains upwards of $35 million, but almost none of the money has been paid out because of an ongoing power struggle to control it between pretty much everyone involved in the program. Who could have predicted such a thing?
FOX News reports:
$35 million in reparations money remains unused as Baltimore officials battle over who gets control: report
Millions in reparations money remain unused as Baltimore officials battle over who gets control, according to a local report.
The Baltimore Beat reported that the $35 million in revenue from the recreational cannabis tax has not reached residents yet due to infighting between City Hall and the Community Reinvestment and Reparations Commission, a 17-member body established in November 2024 to oversee how the funds are distributed.
Since Maryland legalized recreational cannabis three years ago, “not a single dollar has reached the people it was meant to help, and the first round of funding may still be a year away,” the report said.
Why, it’s almost like that was the design…
“Huge Drone Strike on Tuapse Port! Oil Storage Hit,” an oil export terminal on the Black Sea Ukraine has hit before.
“German bill would ban home purchases for people with the wrong political views.” Germans banning rights for being an enemy of the ruling party? I think I’ve seen this movie before…
A Carrollton candidate who confessed to committing voter fraud in a past election is back on the mayoral ballot this May. While the situation is unusual, it’s not unlawful.
In 2024, Zul Mohamed pleaded guilty to more than 100 felony counts of voter fraud in his failed 2020 campaign for Carrollton mayor. A jury sentenced him to four years in state prison while agreeing with his attorney that Mohamed is mentally ill.
But Mohamed is appealing parts of his conviction and sentencing, arguing that the sting operation used to trace a mail-ballot fraud scheme back to him was constitutionally suspect, as is the court’s condition of probation that bars Mohamed from engaging in election-related activities.
Under Texas election law, a person is ineligible to be a candidate if they have been “finally convicted of a felony” or determined by a court to be “mentally incapacitated.”
(Previously.) Seems like the average 7-11 has more stringent vetting than Carrollton…
Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced an investigation into Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies at the University of North Texas.
“The DEI ideology has been a calamitous way that radical leftists have pushed a woke agenda in our educational institutions,” Paxton stated.
As part of the investigation, Paxton sent a letter to Nicole Dash, Dean of the College of Public Affairs and Human Sciences, asking UNT to detail their compliance with state law. While Dash’s academic writing primarily focuses on disaster recovery, she has also written about racial issues.
Paxton is also seeking information about “DEI policies and guidance from the University, details regarding DEI in accreditation standards, and all correspondence between UNT leadership and staff regarding DEI.”
Paxton’s investigation stems from an undercover video that was released earlier this week by Accuracy in Media.
In the video, Paige Falco, a field education coordinator in social work at UNT’s College of Public Affairs and Health Sciences, told an investigator with a hidden camera that DEI is “definitely still a focus” at the institution.
Falco told the investigator that she removed DEI keyphrases from course titles and descriptions, while continuing to teach the concepts.
Later in the video, Falco discussed how “antiracism, diversity, equity, and inclusion” is a competency for the Council on Social Work Education, which accredits the school. The Steve Hicks School of Social Work at UT-Austin also requires so-called “antiracism” training as part of its accreditation with this organization.
Senate Bill 17, a law state lawmakers passed in 2023, prohibits DEI in university human resource policies. SB 17 contains explicit exemptions for accreditation and course content.
The Texas Office of the Attorney General (OAG), alongside the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), announced a settlement with three prominent advertising companies over alleged violations of antitrust laws.
The settlement comes after a multi-state complaint was filed to “combat unlawful media censorship.” The three companies involved are Dentsu US, Inc.; GroupM Worldwide LLC, now known as WPP Media; and Publicis, Inc.
The multi-state complaint also saw participation from Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, Utah, and West Virginia. The complaint alleges the companies violated the 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act, and calls the companies’ conduct “anticompetitive.”
The complaint alleges that the ad agencies, working through the World Federation of Advertisers’ Global Alliance for Responsible Media and the American Association of Advertising Agencies’ Advertiser Protection Bureau, blocked certain websites from being eligible for advertising revenue because they were labeled “misinformation.” The companies allegedly created “brand-safety” rules that made these “misinformation” websites ineligible for business.
The OAG’s announcement stated that the increase in online media coverage has led to large corporations “conspiring ways to suppress certain viewpoints,” favoring particular perspectives and “suppressing disfavored opinions as ‘misinformation.’”
The FTC stated that the defendants’ unlawful collusion “to impose common ‘brand safety’” standards across the industry weakened competitive behavior.
According to the FTC, upon approval by a federal judge, the order will prevent “the biggest U.S. advertising agencies” from restricting advertising based on ideological or political differences.
Although the settlement is subject to court approval, the advertising companies have agreed to several arrangements. The companies reportedly agreed to not enforce limitations on advertising spending based on ideological positions or diversity, equity, and inclusion commitments. They also agreed to not restrict business with any company based on “its news and political or social commentary content.”
Reading between the lines, this was part of the Democrat Media Complex’s attempt to keep anyone from advertising with any conservative media.
Ma Xingrui, a former high-flying technocrat and Xinjiang party secretary, is officially under investigation for corruption charges. That makes him the third member of the current Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo to fall amid President Xi Jinping’s latest purge, as well as the first civilian member.
There are two likely reasons for Ma’s targeting. The first is that Ma was exceptionally capable. He handled politically sensitive assignments in Xinjiang and earlier in Guangdong and the city of Shenzhen with skill and ruthlessness. As I noted in last week’s China Brief, Xi tends to find that kind of talent and ambition threatening.
Second, it’s possible that Ma’s background leading China’s space agencies connected him to the corruption being probed within the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force. However, Ma left the aerospace sector in 2013, before the Second Artillery Corps was reorganized into the Rocket Force and received the surge of funding and authority that enabled such corruption.
Ma’s time in Xinjiang certainly offered opportunities for large-scale graft, from the expropriation of Uyghur property and businesses to the notoriously corrupt paramilitary organization that runs much of the region’s industry, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.
This purges are sort of an under-reported story, and Xi has purged at least two other Politburo members in the last year.
“Wisconsin sheriff sues Pakistani-American woman who said ICE detained her for two days when she was actually at hotel spa.”
US citizen Sundas ‘Sunny’ Naqvi, 28, gained national attention last month when she and a band of supporters – including Cook County, Ill., Commissioner Kevin Morrison — publicly insisted she was unlawfully detained by ICE officers for roughly 43 hours.
Keep Morrison in mind, because we’re going to get back to him in a sec.
Naqvi claimed that after landing back in the US from a work trip to Turkey on the morning of March 5, she was detained for nearly 30 hours at Chicago O’Hare International Airport, then transferred to another ICE facility in Broadview, Ill., before winding up at Dodge County Jail in Wisconsin.
Snip.
Now Naqvi and Morrison are the subjects of a federal defamation lawsuit filed by Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt on Friday — as his office released new details of Naqvi’s actual actions during the alleged hoax period.
‘She checked into the Hampton Inn and Suites in Rosemont, Ill., for the entire duration of this alleged event,’ Schmidt said during a press conference, where he presented a hotel bill and text receipts to illustrate Naqvi’s time there.
The folio shows Naqvi checked in at the Hampton Inn — just a 10-minute drive from the airport — at 1:17 p.m. March 5, while text messages with an unidentified witness over the following days show she enjoyed free food, spa services, and trips to the gym.
Bonus: “Naqvi was previously convicted of making a false report in Cook County, Illinois, and was sentenced to probation.” Also, I’m sure you’ll be shocked to know that Kevin Morrison is a Democrat…
Former Virginia Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shot and killed his wife before turning the gun on himself early Thursday in what the Fairfax County Police Department is calling a murder-suicide.
Police believe Fairfax shot his wife in the basement of their Annandale home, ran upstairs, and shot himself. The couple’s children were in the home at the time of the murders and called 911, according to Fairfax County Police Chief Kevin Davis.
“This has been an ongoing domestic dispute surrounding what seems to be a complicated or messy divorce,” Davis said. “I don’t think it’s a secret that there’s been a divorce proceedings that have been ongoing. From what I understand in this early stage, former Lieutenant Governor Fairfax was recently served some paperwork associated with an upcoming court proceeding that apparently led to this incident last night.”
The couple had been married 20 years, but was currently separated and still living together, according to authorities.
“Separated and still living together” seems like an oxymoron.
Cerina Fairfax filed for divorce in July, according to court records.
Fairfax served as the lieutenant governor under former Democratic Governor Ralph Northam from 2018 to 2022. While in office, the lieutenant governor was accused of sexually assaulting two women years earlier. He maintained the sexual encounters, one of which took place in 2000 and another in 2004, were consensual. He then launched an unsuccessful bid for Virginia governor in 2021, coming in fourth in the Democratic primary. Prior to his tenure as lieutenant governor, Justin Fairfax served as a federal prosecutor.
Funny how many Democrats hyped as “the next big thing” (Stacey Abrams, Andrew Gillum) turned out to have dark secrets, though none quite as dark as a murder-suicide.
Phil Collins has been elected to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, along with Oasis, Billy Idol, Wu-Tang Clan, Luther Vandross, Sade, Joy Division/New Order and Iron Maiden. You can argue that Collins is more pop than rock in his solo career, but he’s certainly more rock than Vandross, Sade, and a lot of already-inducted artists.
Every day brings new revelations about how widespread welfare state fraud runs rampant in blue states like Minnesota and California. Is Texas immune from fraud? Not entirely.
Amid a national debate over waste, fraud, and abuse in federal health and welfare programs, Texas lawmakers heard testimony this week on potential problems in state oversight of taxpayer-funded programs designed to assist the poor.
“We are dealing today with a healthcare epidemic, but not from a disease or virus. We are examining a nationwide epidemic of fraud in healthcare,” said state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham), chair of the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.
Kolkhorst presided over a nine-hour hearing in Austin on Wednesday, prompted by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s interim charges and President Donald Trump’s call for greater oversight in state-managed programs.
Although the state’s 8 percent “error” rate in administering the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is lower than many other states, under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Texas must reduce that rate to 6 percent or less or else face significant penalties. The state must also reduce the Medicaid eligibility error rate to 3 percent or less.
“New federal laws are now going to make it imperative for Texas to reform some of its eligibility programs and improve its compliance with regulations for Medicaid and especially SNAP,” said Kolkhorst. “For the first time in history, states must now fund part of the SNAP program, and improper payments and errors in that system will cost us hundreds of millions of dollars.”
Witnesses informed the committee of potential oversight problems in Medicaid and other programs.
Kaitlyn Finley of the Foundation for Government Accountability said that Texas’ “reasonable opportunity period” (ROP) gives new Medicaid recipients up to 90 days to prove their immigration status, but that some were continuing to remain on temporary status for as many as 1,800 days without documentation.
“The costs have exploded under this policy,” said Finley. “Texas ROP spending went from $650,000 in 2019 to $13 million in 2023. That’s a 1,900 percent increase.”
Finley also noted that Texas had spent over $1 billion in Fiscal Year 2025 on emergency Medicaid for illegal immigrants. She said the state’s “honor system,” allowing applicants to self-report household members, residency, and income without verification, should be reformed.
Jamie Dudensing, President and CEO of the Texas Association of Health Plans (TAHP), which oversees the state’s Medicaid-managed care organizations and dental managed care groups, noted that implementation of prior authorization standards had reduced abuse of a state-managed orthodontics program and reduced “inappropriate use” by 72 percent.
Dudensing warned, however, that preventing abuse of programs requires constant monitoring and her organization often must work with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to refine guardrails for various programs.
One area of service not under TAHP or other close scrutiny is the state’s hospice network.
Lisa McNair, President and CEO of Hospice Brazos Valley and treasurer for the Hospice Alliance, presented data on taxpayer-supported hospice providers and warned of “low patient counts, multiple hospices in one building, high ‘live discharge’ rates, excessive billing, and shared staff across multiple companies.”
McNair noted that the number of hospice providers in Texas had increased by 98.5 percent since January 2020 for a total of 1,366 as of March 2026, and that 308 of the newest providers were co-located with at least one and as many as 15 other hospices.
“Data showed 15 hospices located in one building on the Northwest Loop 410 in San Antonio. Two were established in 2019, 13 were established in 2021,” said McNair. “[At] 9896 Bissonnet in Houston, there were six hospices, one foundation, one health care company and three [medical services] companies, all with the same owner.”
McNair also pointed out that although hospice serves terminally ill patients — those diagnosed with six months or less to live — at least seven Texas hospices had a 100 percent “live discharge” rate and another 25 had live discharge rates of greater than 90 percent.
It’s an Easter miracle! The dying have been healed!
This week, the California attorney general filed charges against a Los Angeles hospice care fraud ring reportedly responsible for $267 million in fraud, as part of an ongoing federal and state investigation.
Multiple witnesses offered recommendations for limiting fraud, waste, and abuse, including creating means tests for providers and establishing statewide service provider identification numbers and a state database of those providers.
Finley also suggested counting all income for SNAP households and codifying a “proper definition” for qualified aliens to match that in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. She also suggested Texas adopt a policy requiring notification to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement when an illegal alien applies for Medicaid, such as that in Louisiana.
Dudensing recommended creating a task force at HHSC with a focus on waste, fraud, and abuse.
California clearly has an order of magnitude or two (or maybe three) more fraud than Texas, and California’s fraud obviously has support at the highest levels of state government because leftwing activists are the ones getting their beaks wet, which clearly isn’t the case in Texas. But as the hearings shows, there’s still plenty of room for improvement…
It’s amazing how quickly post-Obama Democrats went from at least pretending to care about border security to absolutely opposing deporting any illegal alien felons for any reason. Evidently nothing will prevent Democrats from treating ICE agents as the enemy.
Well, almost nothing.
It turns out that Democrats can be brought back into compliance using the universal language of politics: Money.
Houston’s new ordinance prohibiting police from detaining suspects with administrative warrants from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) may cause the city to lose $110 million in state grants for public safety.
In a 12 to 5 vote last week, the Houston City Council approved a proposition submitted by Council Members Alejandra Salinas, Abbie Kamin, and Ed Pollard that rescinded a previous Houston Police Department policy under which officers could detain suspects with the administrative warrants for up to 30 minutes while waiting for ICE to respond.
On Monday, Gov. Greg Abbott’s office notified Houston Mayor John Whitmire that the city’s newly approved policy breached agreements with the state to receive certain grants for public safety purposes.
Should the governor’s office rescind the grants, the city will be required to repay $110 million already received. Earlier this month, City Controller Chris Hollins forecast that the city will face a budget deficit of $174 million by the end of the fiscal year.
Even for a city as big as Houston, $110 million is a lot of cheddar. And lo and behold, Houston City Council appears to be changing course.
Houston Mayor John Whitmire is calling for a repeal of a city ordinance limiting cooperation between the Houston Police Department and federal immigration authorities, just days after voting in favor of it himself, as Gov. Greg Abbott threatens to pull more than $110 million in state public safety grants.
The ordinance, passed by the city council in a 12-5 vote on April 8, eliminates a prior requirement that HPD officers hold individuals for up to 30 minutes to allow U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to respond to the scene. Under the new policy, a routine stop ends when the original lawful basis for the stop ends. The measure also adds a quarterly public reporting requirement for HPD detailing how often officers inquire about immigration status or contact federal authorities.
Snip.
Whitmire voted in favor of the ordinance last week, saying at the time it reflected existing HPD practices. By this week, his position had shifted. Speaking after a press conference about the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the mayor said the city had no choice but to act.
“We’ve got to correct that policy,” Whitmire said. “There’s only one opinion that matters, and that’s the governor’s. We can’t survive in a city that does not have public safety funding to the tune of losing $110 million.”
He also blamed the ordinance’s sponsors, saying three council members running for office decided to elevate the issue unnecessarily. Salinas is currently running for Harris County Attorney.
Whitmire has called a special city council meeting for Friday morning to vote on whether to repeal the ordinance. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has also opened an investigation into whether the new policy violates state law.
The ordinance drew criticism from the Houston Police Officers’ Union from the start. Union president Douglas Griffith argued that council members were overstepping into matters the department had already handled internally under Police Chief Noe Diaz, and warned that without a defined window for ICE to respond, individual officers could face personal liability.
The union also noted that only around 75 traffic stops last year resulted in someone with an immigration warrant being turned over to ICE, and framed the ordinance as a distraction from the city’s $170 million budget deficit.
The five council members who voted against the ordinance—Amy Peck, Willie Davis, Fred Flickinger, Twila Carter, and Mary Nan Huffman—issued a joint statement warning that the measure would make officers afraid to do their jobs and expose the city to potential lawsuits.
The dispute carries legal weight beyond the grant question. Senate Bill 4, signed by Abbott in 2017, requires local governments and law enforcement agencies to comply with federal immigration detainer requests and imposes penalties including removal from office, fines up to $25,000 per day, and criminal charges for officials who knowingly fail to comply.
Money talks. Democrats will do just about anything to pander to the open borders activists that increasingly make up the party’s woke mind virus-infected ideological core, but evidently all sorts of “immutable principles” turn out to be very mutable indeed when there’s real money involved.
In a follow-up to two different stories we’ve been following, both Texas Republican Representative Tony Gonzalez and California Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell have resigned from congress.
Embattled Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Tony Gonzales (R-TX) have resigned from Congress.
We all know Swalwell faces numerous sexual assault and misconduct allegations, including a woman who went on camera this morning.
Gonzales’s story has flown under the radar. He dropped out of the 2026 race after admitting to an affair with a former staffer who committed suicide in September 2025.
Self-serving Swalwell codswallop snipped.
Gonzales’s resignation letter is short:
The Honorable, the speaker House of Representatives, sir. Enclosed is my resignation letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, effective April 14, 2026, at 11:59pm, Eastern Standard Time. It has been my privilege to serve the residents of Texas’s 23rd congressional district. Signed sincerely, Tony Gonzales, member of Congress.
Both Rep. Eric Swalwell D-CA and Rep. Tony Gonzales R-TX have submitted their resignation letters to the Speaker. Swalwell’s resignation is effective immediately. Gonzales is done at midnight.
The thing both have in common is that they were adulterous scumbags, but at least Gonzales wasn’t accused of rape. As of this writing, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has yet to set a date for a special election to pick someone to fill out Gonzales’ term for TX-23, but Brandon Herrera has already secured the Republican nomination and will be running against Democrat Katy Padilla Stout in the general election in November.
Hopefully long before then, Eric Swalwell will have been indicted on multiple charges of rape and sexual assault.
It seems like just yesterday (because it was) we were reporting that Democrats were trying to push Rep. Eric Swalwell out of the California Governor’s race to clear the way for Katie Porter by coordinated accusations that he was a sexual predator, up to and including rape. Then, before the day was done, he announced he was dropping out of the race to clear his name, much like O.J. Simpson looking for the “real killer.”
Representative Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) on Monday announced his resignation from Congress after four women, including a former staffer, came forward with sexual misconduct allegations against him.
After the San Francisco Chronicle revealed Friday that a former staffer had come forward with allegations that Swalwell sexually assaulted her on two occasions while she was intoxicated, CNN contributed accounts from three other women who accused the representative of sexual misconduct, including sending them unsolicited explicit messages or nude photos.
The backlash was swift — he lost all 21 of the endorsements he had received from fellow Democratic members of Congress; GOP Representative Anna Paulina Luna said she would move to expel him from Congress; and the House Ethics Committee and Manhattan District Attorney’s Office are investigating allegations against him. He was left with no choice but to suspend his campaign for California governor. He was largely considered the frontrunner in a wide-open race to replace term-limited Governor Gavin Newsom.
Self-fluffing blather snipped.
He did not say when exactly he would exit Congress. With Swalwell’s resignation, California Governor Gavin Newsom can decide whether to call a special election this close to an already scheduled election. The state’s primary is on June 2. Swalwell was no running for reelection because of his now-shuttered campaign for governor.
In a congress full of sleazeballs and scumbags, Swalwell was somehow among the sleaziest and scummiest. And that was before we found out he should probably be on the sex offender registry. Whoever replaces him in congress will likely be a far left social justice whackjob, but will still be less slimy and repugnant than Swalwell.
